For promoting research abilities among researchers and International Academic Publishing House (www.iaph.in) publishes ”International Journal of Experimental Research and Review” (e-ISSN: 2455-4855),  an academic peer reviewed journal in all branches of ‘Science’ that publishes full papers of Original research articles, Reviews, Project works, Review papers, Short communication, Conferences and Seminar papers. As part of its objective, International Academic Publishing House itself adopts a neutral position on issues treated within its Journal.

  • International Academic Publishing House is committed to meeting and upholding standards of ethical behaviour at all stages of the publication process.
  • All submitted research articles are assessed by our Editorial board members and specialist of that particular field utilizing the double-blind peer reviewing methods to ensure the quality and fair policy of publication, evaluation process so as to avoid plagiarism.
  • ”International Journal of Experimental Research and Review” sets quality standards for the acceptance of appropriate and most effective research articles.
  • Our journal is always ready to harvest views and suggestion of authors and editorial board members to improve the journal quality.
  • It follows that the authors, the journal editors (the best practices defined by the Committee of Publication Ethics, COPE), the peer-reviewers, the publisher,and the journal have responsibilities to meet expected ethical standards at all stages in their involvement from submission to publication of an article.
  • We always assign the reviewing process to our suitable qualified editorial board members.

Our team follows different processes, which encourage accuracy and clarity of research paper and including the technical editing if required. All process was done by Editor-in- Chief and members of Executive editors and their decision is final.

Editorial Board & Duties of Editors:

 

  • International Journal of Experimental Research and Review has a suitable qualified editorial board in various fields and others qualified experts are invited as is required. Editor has ultimate responsibility for deciding if a manuscript submitted to International Journal of Experimental Research and Review should be published, and in doing so is guided by the journal’s policies as determined by the editorial board of International Journal of Experimental Research and Review. The Editor in chief may consult with the Associate Editors and other members of the editorial team, as well as with reviewers, in making publication decisions.
  • The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  • All the articles are considered and accepted solely on their academic merit and without commercial influence.
  • An editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  • The Editors and editorial staff will not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as considered appropriate.
  • A conflict of interest is a situation in which financial or other personal considerations from authors or reviewers have the potential to compromise or bias professional judgment and objectivity. Authors and reviewers should declare all conflicts of interest relevant to the work under consideration (i.e., relationships, both financial and personal, that might interfere with the interpretation of the work) to avoid the potential for bias.
  • Editors should refuse themselves (i.e. should ask a co-editor, associate editor or other member of the editorial board instead to review and consider) from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or (possibly) institutions connected to the papers.
  • Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the expressed written consent of the author.
  • The editors may need to seek clarification in this regard with the author(s) and request that they supply a letter from the relevant institutional ethics committee or board that approved the research.
  • An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant even if it is discovered years after publication.

Authors & Responsibility of Authors:

 

  • By submitting a manuscript to International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, the author(s) warrant that the manuscript is their own, original work and that it has neither been published previously nor is currently being considered for publication elsewhere. They also warrant that the sources of any ideas and/or words in the manuscript that are not their own have been properly attributed through appropriate citations and/or quotes.
  • Authors’ names are not concealed. Editors and reviewers are expected to handle the manuscripts confidentially.
  • It is clearly advised to the authors to avoid copy and paste tactic of writing articles.
  • Authors of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and the results, followed by an objective discussion of the significance of the work.
  • The manuscript should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Review articles should be accurate, objective and comprehensive, while editorial ‘opinion’ or perspective pieces should be clearly identified as such. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
  • Articles must showcase novelty in thoughts and content.
  • Authors should ensure that any studies involving human or animal subjects conform to national, local and institutional laws and requirements (e.g., WMA Declaration of Helsinki, NIH Policy on Use of Laboratory Animals, EU Directive on Use of Animals) and confirm that approval has been sought and obtained where appropriate. Authors should obtain express permission from human subjects and respect their privacy.
  • To declare any potential conflicts of interest (e.g., where the author has a competing interest (real or apparent) that could be considered or viewed as exerting an undue influence on his or her duties at any stage during the publication process).
  • To notify promptly the journal editor or publisher if a significant error in their publication is identified. To cooperate with the editor and publisher to publish an erratum, addendum, corrigendum notice, or to retract the paper, where this is deemed necessary.
  • Appropriate Citations, referencing of individual articles, authors and publications are expected while writing articles.
  • Authors should accept and correct the mistakes and consider the suggestions given by the panel of reviewers.
  • Authors should bring in knowledge of editor the corrections and retraction of mistakes or error if have identified even after publication.
  • During the course of study whatever sources are accessed and used must be mentioned in the article for publication.
  • The corresponding author that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  • If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
  • All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
  • All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  • Once we found enough evidence(s) to prove that the misconduct was true, the author is informed about their misconduct to get their clarification on the matter.
  • When author fails to provide enough evidence(s) to prove his/her work or denies the misconduct, we have the right to reject his/her article from our journal, in case if already published then we have the right to remove the article from our website.
  • To maintain accurate records of data associated with their submitted manuscript, and to supply or provide access to these data, on reasonable request. Where appropriate and where allowed by employer, funding body and others who might have an interest, to deposit data in a suitable repository or storage location, for sharing and further use by others.

 

Changes in Authorship:

 

  • Request to add or remove a corresponding author before publication of the manuscript.
  • Need a letter from all authors for changing it. If all authors agree the authorship will be changed.
  • If all authors don’t agree, the article will be suspended until all authors agree to change in authorship details.

Duties of Reviewers & Peer-Review process:

 

  • To contribute to the decision-making process, and to assist in improving the quality of the published paper by reviewing the manuscript objectively, in a timely manner.
  • To maintain the confidentiality of any information supplied by the editor or author. To not retain or copy the manuscript.
  • To alert the editor to any published or submitted content that is substantially similar to that under review.
  • To be aware of any potential conflicts of interest (financial, institutional, collaborative or other relationships between the reviewer and author) and to alert the editor to these, if necessary, withdrawing their services for that manuscript.
  • Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  • Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage.
  • Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  • Usually, it takes 1-2 weeks for review process depending on the length, domain, clarity of work, research methodology used etc.
  • The final decision is taken by the chief editor by considering all comments and suggestions provided by the reviewers.

Flowchart of Review Process

 

IAPH--paper-publishing-process

Publisher Responsibilities:

 

  • International Academic Publishing House on behalf of which it publishes shall ensure that good practice be maintained to meet the standards outlined above.
  • For International Journal of Experimental Research and Review more detailed ethical procedures will be set out and brought to the attention of journal editors and editorial boards.
  • In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editors, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum, clarification or, in the most severe case, the retraction of the affected work.
  • The publisher, together with the editors, shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, and under no circumstances shall encourage such misconduct or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place.

Publication Ethics:

 

  • To maintain the quality, we follow the double-blind peer reviewing methods to ensure the quality and fair policy of publication.
  • International Journal of Experimental Research and Review always assign the reviewing process to our suitable qualified editorial board members.
  • The journal requires that all authors, reviewers and editors disclose any potential sources of conflict of interest. Any interest or relationship, financial or otherwise that might be perceived as influencing objectivity is considered a potential source of conflict of interest.
  • Ethical issue is followed by recommended actions as advised by COPE (Committee of Publication Ethics) for Journal Editors and when available additional reading is added.
  • The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal’s editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  • A conflict of interest is a situation in which financial or other personal considerations from authors or reviewers have the potential to compromise or bias professional judgment and objectivity. Authors and reviewers should declare all conflicts of interest relevant to the work under consideration (i.e., relationships, both financial and personal, that might interfere with the interpretation of the work) to avoid the potential for bias.
  • Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor’s own research without the express written consent of the author.
  • An editor should take reasonably responsive measures when ethical complaints have been presented concerning a submitted manuscript or published paper, in conjunction with the publisher (or society). Such measures will generally include contacting the author of the manuscript or paper and giving due consideration of the respective complaint or claims made, but may also include further communications to the relevant institutions and research bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, the publication of a correction, retraction, expression of concern, or other note, as may be relevant even if it is discovered years after publication.
  • Authors should ensure that any studies involving human or animal subjects conform to national, local and institutional laws and requirements (e.g., WMA Declaration of Helsinki, NIH Policy on Use of Laboratory Animals, EU Directive on Use of Animals) and confirm that approval has been sought and obtained where appropriate. Authors should obtain express permission from human subjects and respect their privacy.
  • Once we found enough evidence(s) to prove the misconduct was true, the author is informed about their misconduct to get their clarification on the matter.
  • Experimental plant research must adhere to institutional, national and/or international guidelines. Field research must also adhere to institutional, national and/or international guidelines and appropriate licenses and/or permissions should be obtained before work commences.
  • When an author fails to provide enough evidence(s) to prove his/her work or denies the misconduct, we have the right to reject his/her article from our journal, in case if already published then we have the right to remove the article from our website.

Misconduct Handling:

 

  • If any misconduct information submitted by reviewer or reader, our team plans to investigate the issue to collect evidence for the scenario.
  • Once we found enough evidence(s) to prove the misconduct was true, the author is informed about their misconduct to get their clarification on the matter.
  • In cases of alleged or proven scientific misconduct, fraudulent publication or plagiarism, the publisher, in close collaboration with the editors, will take all appropriate measures to clarify the situation and to amend the article in question. This includes the prompt publication of an erratum, clarification or, in the most severe case, the retraction of the affected work.
  • The publisher, together with the editors, shall take reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, and under no circumstances encourage such misconduct or knowingly allow such misconduct to take place.
  • Once we found enough evidence(s) to prove the misconduct was true, the author is informed about their misconduct to get their clarification on the matter.
  • When author fails to provide enough evidence(s) to prove his/her work or denies the misconduct, we have the right to reject his/her article from our journal, in case if already published then we have the right to remove the article from our website.
  • Author(s) agree to the terms that theInternational Journal of Experimental Research and Review will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.

Copyright & Access:

 

  • Submission Manuscript does not violet the copyright or trademark and has not been published before.
  • When the Manuscript is accepted for publication, the author agrees to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
  • Author(s) and co-author(s) jointly and separately represent and warrant that the Article is original with the author(s) and does not infringe any copyright or violate any other right of any third parties, and that the Article has not been published elsewhere. Author(s) agree to the terms that theInternational Journal of Experimental Research and Review will have the full right to remove the published article on any misconduct found in the published article.
  • All authors must ensure that the article has been written with ethical standards in mind and are also responsible regarding the originality.

Archiving:

 

  • International Academic Publishing House requires, as a condition for publication, that all data supporting the results in papers published in its journals are archived in an appropriate public archive offering open access. Authors can freely download the PDF file from which they can print unlimited copies of their articles.
  • We provide only Full text (in PDF) of the article (No hard copy). Authors can freely access from our website of that article (in PDF format only). The corresponding author will receive a pdf file of the published paper via e-mail also.

Ownership and Management:

 

International Academic Publishing House (www.iaph.in) publishes ”International Journal of Experimental Research and Review”, an academic peer reviewed journal in all branches of ‘Science’ that publishes full papers of original research articles, reviews, Project works, Review papers, short communication, Conferences and Seminar papers. As part of its objective, International Academic Publishing House itself adopts a neutral position on issues treated within its Journal. When the Manuscript is accepted for publication, the author agrees to automatic transfer of the copyright to the publisher.
www.iaph.in is our website. All the necessaryies information have been provided on the website.

Name of the Journal:

 

“International Journal of Experimental Research and Review”
ISSN: 2455-4855

With Warm Regards,
Chief-in-Editor
International Journal of Experimental Research and Review
International Academic Publishing House
Website: www.iaph.in

125total visits,1visits today